16 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 258a
Online Reference: FLWSUPP 163ALARC
Insurance -- Personal injury protection -- Withdrawal of benefits -- Where insurer notified insured that it was refusing to pay benefits for any care after date of independent medical examination, but insured continued treatment nonetheless and submitted last set of bills after discharge from treatment; insurer, upon receipt of last bills, failed to make any payments, including payment for care that occurred prior to IME; and, on date suit was filed, insurer did not possess peer review report opining that some of treatment was not medically necessary or related, denial of benefits could not have occurred later than date insured filed suit -- Peer review report obtained after denial of benefits is inadmissible -- Question certified whether expert testimony based on a physician's report that was not first obtained by the insurer before PIP benefits were withdrawn or denied in violation of the statutory predicate under § 627.736(7)(a), Fla. Stat. (2003) is admissible to support an insurer's legal defense on medical necessity and relatedness in an action for PIP benefits? -- Demand letter -- Where no payments were made, demand letter that failed to specify amount due at 80% and take deducible into account but to which bills were attached substantially complied with statute