14 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 315b
Insurance -- Personal injury protection -- Directed verdict -- Reference in final judgment to “verdict” entered in favor of medical provider indicates trial court entered directed verdict, not summary judgment -- Entering directed verdict prior to trial is improper, but does not amount to reversible error if legally justified -- Evidence -- Affidavits -- Although insurer failed to preserve issue of sufficiency of physician's affidavit by challenging affidavit with trial court, appellate court must examine affidavit to fulfill duty to determine whether it is insufficient to support verdict as matter of law -- Affidavit was insufficient as matter of law, and trial court erred in entering directed verdict where issue before court was not merely reasonableness of amount of bills, but also relatedness and necessity of treatment, and affidavit merely recites statutory standard for when bills are payable under PIP policy and fails to state nature of insured's condition, proper treatment for condition, nature and extent of treatment actually provided, whether physician was insured's treating physician and what made treatment reasonable, related and necessary -- Even if trial court entered summary judgment, it erred in doing so based on affidavit insufficient to demonstrate conclusively nonexistence of genuine issue of material fact